Dr. Max R. Lambert (he/him)

I’m a conservation biologist who focuses predominantly on amphibians and reptiles. My work is centered on understanding whether wild animals can or cannot live in our cities and suburbs and how we can create and manage urban habitat and populations for more biodiverse urban areas. My research ranges from understanding how females and males are differently affected by urbanization to understanding how the stress of urban living causes animals to evolve. Check out my research, community engagement, and media highlights. Find me on Twitter or send me an email to learn more!


*Spring 2021* – I’ve excitedly taken the job of Aquatic Research Manager, a senior scientist position where I manage a team of amazing researchers at the Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife. It’s a privilege to get to do cutting edge science that serves people, wildlife, and the environment. Keep looking at the site for updates, we’ll have lots of exciting conservation science to come!

*17 December, 2020* Do species really adaptive evolve to live in cities? Read our latest synthesis in TREE where we critically assess the evidence for urban adaptation. What a pleasure to work with and learn from Kristien Brans, Simone Des Roches, Colin Donihue, and Sarah Diamond on this work!

*13 August, 2020* Systemic racism and classism are powerful forces shaping cities. Social inequality has dramatic impacts on diverse human communities but also shapes urban biodiversity and ecosystems. Our new paper in Science synthesizes the links between racism and other forms of social inequality with ecology, evolutionary biology, and conservation in cities. Wonderful to lead this paper with Chris Schell and the amazing team of Karen Dyson, Tracy Fuentes, Simone Des Roches, Nyeema Harris, Danica Miller, and Cleo Woelfle-Erskine.

*11 May, 2020* Species are evolving to live in our cities. Does this matter for urban biodiversity conservation and management? Colin Donihue and I discuss this in a new paper in Nature Ecology & Evolution.

*20 March, 2020* Read this reanalysis and comment in Science by my colleagues and myself. We show that a study in 2019 by Scheele et al. cannot be reproduced due to a large dearth of data. The Scheele et al. study claimed >500 amphibian species declined (with 90 going extinct) due to the amphibian chytrid fungus. Our reanalysis shows the paper by Scheele et al. is harmful to conservation and our fundamental understanding of amphibian disease. Also see this Dynamic Ecology post inspired by our Comment and which highlights the harm done to science and conservation when rebuttals do not address the critiques of original studies.


email: lambert.mrm@gmail.com        twitter: @MaxRLambert

Curriculum Vitae (updated 18 Nov, 2020):Max R Lambert CV_new

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s